41042 Satisfied customers
Expert in: Family Law, Legal, Estate Law, Real Estate Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Business Law, Consumer Protection Law, Bankruptcy Law, Traffic Law, Personal Injury Law.
41042 Satisfied customers
Jessica
Consultant
Chris The Lawyer, Expert
Hi
I am a New Zealand lawyer based in Wellington and will help you with your question today. Please give me a minute to read the question
Chris The Lawyer, Expert
How may I help-I often answer tenancy questions here
Chris The Lawyer, Expert
Have you seen the meth test result? You should insist on seeing that before they take steps to decontaminate
Chris The Lawyer, Expert
Otherwise you could take their option to decontaminate but you should be aware that meth tests are controversial and don't meant much unless done properly and with proper testing by experienced analysts. He should not have visited without your consent, and that may be why he is trying to avoid the tribunal
Chris The Lawyer, Expert
So getting rid of the furniture and toys may not be necessary if their test results are dodgy
Chris The Lawyer, Expert
If the house was contaminated when you moved in, then yes, they would need to pay for your relocation
Chris The Lawyer, Expert
It could be the furniture-if someone had smoked in the house it would be on the walls and ceiling, not just the furniture. You could get your own tests done of course
Chris The Lawyer, Expert
I think getting your own testing, with instructions to see if this was old contamination. That could be hard to prove, but with no testing done when you moved in, there is an issue