206448 Satisfied customers
Expert in: Family Law, Legal, Estate Law, Real Estate Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Business Law, Consumer Protection Law, Bankruptcy Law, Traffic Law, Personal Injury Law.
206448 Satisfied customers
Jessica
Consultant
LawEducator, Expert
I know your question is important and I’m working on typing an answer to your question now. You can select the premium service phone call option if you prefer to do a phone call.
Sometimes responses and replies take time, and we ask you to be courteous and patient to allow the expert to type answers to you and also to others.
LawEducator, Expert
Good morning Walter, I see you were up a little late.
Let me ask this clarifying question:
What type of evidence are you asking to introduce, let's start there?
LawEducator, Expert
Good day, here is the answer to your query. Please do not hesitate continue to engage with the expert and to ask any follow up questions related to this response and know that I will respond as soon as I can.
There is a specific process to introduce evidence.
Rule 901 of the MI rules of evidence (https://casetext.com/rule/michigan-court-rules/michigan-rules-of-evidence/rule-901-903/rule-901-requirement-of-authentication-or-identification) requires authentication of the evidence.
Authentication means you need to first put a person on the stand under oath who as firsthand knowledge of the photo or video, typically the person who took it, and they must testify as to the date and time it was taken.
Once that is done, you ask the court to admit the evidence as being authenticated.
In showing a witness the evidence, you first ask them about the event depicted by the photo or video, then you show them the exhibit and ask them to describe/explain it and ask them if that is an accurate depiction of what occurred.
LawEducator, Expert
The process is the same, you still have to question and authenticate evidence and use the screen sharing like I sent you the instructions on.
LawEducator, Expert
You should yes, to the opposing party and to the judge's clerk.
LawEducator, Expert
Now would be best.
LawEducator, Expert
No.
You need to state under oath that you took the photos and the date and then you need to show them to the witness and ask if they can identify the items in the photo and then you say to the judge, the witness has authenticated the photo and I ask that it be admitted into evidence.
LawEducator, Expert
That makes sense.
So you can refer to it only, since the judge is not taking the evidence. You can ask the judge if you can show the witness a picture so they can identify the property in question.
LawEducator, Expert
Yes, the clerk gives the oath to the witnesses.
All testimony is under oath.
LawEducator, Expert
Yes, that is correct.
LawEducator, Expert
It is okay on zoom, they will be visible.
Dan isn't going to argue they were manipulated, he would be foolish to try that.
LawEducator, Expert
But he knows you are able to produce the original and you can tell the court that too.
LawEducator, Expert
Thank you!
If you have questions on other topics or issues, you can ask me directly at https://www.justanswer.com/law/expert-paulm. Please make sure that you type “For LawEducator Only...” in the question subject to ensure that the question is directed to me.
Please add me to your favorites at the bottom of the page so you can get to me more directly in the future. Also, you can reach reach me directly in chat just by typing @LawEducator in the new question chat.
Although I can’t always give good news, I am direct and do my best to simplify things for people to understand.