As explained, the claim and counter claim all ready filed and served at london small claim court. The procedure required

Customer: As explained, the claim and counter claim all ready filed and served at london small claim court. The procedure required a preliminary settlement conference which not decided yet. What is your advice for filing a motion to the court to stop the bank from charging interests on the disputed forged account as far as a certified documents examiner report was submitted in the case file which proved the bank misconduct and default beyond any doubt. What is the possibility of success of such motion?. Can I also request the court to freeze all our accounts agreements with the bank as far their is enough evidences to prove the bank default. The supreme Court of Canada judgments in similar cases decided that lack of good faith and honest performance is a legitimate cause to invalidate any agreement. Accordingly, forgery is a legitimate reason for the court not to dismiss my motion and to freeze all agreementsorts with the bank. But the problem I have experienced before with similar cases against Rogers and Bell Canada, that their are other factors may influence the court decision against a federally regulated institutions, and possibly reject the motion. Because In this case their is slso criminsl factors in the bank conducts. I doubted the court will conducts a criminall investigation as required by law and I didn't requested such action not to delay my case. What is your advice in the proposed motion particularly and in the case generally?
JA: How to get my car started when it was totally dead. Is there anything else the Lawyer should know before I connect you? Rest assured that they'll be able to help you.
Customer: Nothing else required at this moment and my case was explained clearly, just need your advice.